PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPFD vs. QTPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPFD vs. QTPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPFD achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than QTPI's 0.84% return.


FPFD

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.81%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
7.66%
5Y*
10Y*

QTPI

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.41%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPFD vs. QTPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FPFD and QTPI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPFD vs. QTPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPFD
FPFD Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FPFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPFD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FPFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPFD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QTPI
QTPI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QTPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QTPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPFD vs. QTPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPFDQTPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.22

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.42

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

9.97

-1.33

FPFD vs. QTPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the QTPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPFD and QTPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPFDQTPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.23

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.19

-0.86

Drawdowns

FPFD vs. QTPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPFD drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than QTPI's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPFD and QTPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPFDQTPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-4.08%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.11%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.68%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-0.40%

-6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.52%

+0.21%

Volatility

FPFD vs. QTPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is 1.00%, while North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that FPFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPFDQTPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.42%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

3.19%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

4.55%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.32%

4.98%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.32%

4.98%

+0.34%

FPFD vs. QTPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPFD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than QTPI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPFD vs. QTPI - Dividend Comparison

FPFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than QTPI's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.15%5.04%4.89%5.09%5.22%1.59%
QTPI
North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF
4.44%4.58%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPFD and QTPI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTPI has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to FPFD (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPFD dropped -20.83% vs QTPI's -4.08%.

On 1-year performance, FPFD leads with 6.27% vs 5.09% for QTPI. On fees, FPFD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FPFD has performed better with a 6.27% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPFD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTPI.

FPFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 4.44% for QTPI.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and North Square. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPFD and 0.60% for QTPI.

FPFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPFD and QTPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer