FPFD vs. BND
FPFD (Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPFD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. FPFD is actively managed, while BND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FPFD returned 7.66%/yr vs 3.96%/yr for BND. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FPFD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
FPFD vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPFD achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return.
FPFD
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
FPFD vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 0.73% | 6.46% | 8.50% | 10.91% | -17.11% | 1.89% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.27% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPFD and BND is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.45 |
The correlation between FPFD and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPFD vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
FPFD
BND
FPFD vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPFD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.24 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.92 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 5.80 | +2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPFD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.36 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.59 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
FPFD vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPFD drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPFD and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPFD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -18.58% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -2.68% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.92% | -5.92% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -2.37% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -3.06% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.88% | -0.15% |
Volatility
FPFD vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is 1.00%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that FPFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPFD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 1.23% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 2.66% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95% | 3.78% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 6.02% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 5.53% | -0.21% |
FPFD vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPFD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPFD vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
FPFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than BND's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 5.15% | 5.04% | 4.89% | 5.09% | 5.22% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPFD and BND have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BND has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to FPFD (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPFD dropped -20.83% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 3-year performance, FPFD leads with 7.66% vs 3.96% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FPFD has performed better with a 7.66% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPFD.
FPFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 3.97% for BND.
FPFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPFD and 0.03% for BND.
FPFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPFD and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer