PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPE vs. SPFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPE vs. SPFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPE achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than SPFF's 6.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FPE has outperformed SPFF with an annualized return of 5.04%, while SPFF has yielded a comparatively lower 3.13% annualized return.


FPE

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.26%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
5.04%

SPFF

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.90%
YTD
6.91%
6M
8.28%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPE vs. SPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPE
First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF
0.97%9.21%11.17%6.84%-12.77%5.24%6.00%18.15%-4.98%11.26%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.91%7.52%8.62%3.00%-14.29%5.15%6.91%13.04%-2.55%1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FPE and SPFF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013

0.53

The correlation between FPE and SPFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPE vs. SPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPE
SPFF

Financial Services

9.2%
54.4%

Utilities

3.1%
14.2%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Communication Services

0.4%
2.0%

Industrials

0.4%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.0%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Technology

-

18.3%

Financial Services

FPE
9.2%
SPFF
54.4%

Utilities

FPE
3.1%
SPFF
14.2%

Real Estate

FPE
2.3%
SPFF
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

FPE
0.8%
SPFF

-

Communication Services

FPE
0.4%
SPFF
2.0%

Industrials

FPE
0.4%
SPFF
1.8%

Basic Materials

FPE

-

SPFF
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FPE

-

SPFF
3.0%

Energy

FPE

-

SPFF

-

Healthcare

FPE

-

SPFF
3.2%

Technology

FPE

-

SPFF
18.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPE vs. SPFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPE
FPE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SPFF
SPFF Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPE vs. SPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPESPFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.34

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.45

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

7.46

+2.01

FPE vs. SPFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the SPFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPE and SPFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPESPFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.96

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.20

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.23

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.30

+0.23

Drawdowns

FPE vs. SPFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPE drawdown since its inception was -33.35%, smaller than the maximum SPFF drawdown of -35.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPE and SPFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPESPFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.35%

-35.92%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-7.58%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

-12.51%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.65%

-22.88%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.35%

-35.92%

+2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.20%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-4.06%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

2.49%

-1.59%

Volatility

FPE vs. SPFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) is 1.10%, while Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that FPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPESPFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

2.97%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

7.29%

-4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

9.53%

-5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

10.93%

-4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

13.51%

-3.34%

FPE vs. SPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPFF's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPE vs. SPFF - Dividend Comparison

FPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, less than SPFF's 6.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPE
First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.84%5.81%5.68%6.03%5.67%4.48%4.88%5.32%6.14%5.39%5.97%5.49%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.34%6.47%6.39%6.64%7.15%5.78%5.75%5.97%7.60%7.24%7.04%7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPE and SPFF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPFF has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to FPE (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPE dropped -33.35% vs SPFF's -35.92%.

On 10-year performance, FPE leads with 5.04% vs 3.13% for SPFF. On fees, SPFF is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FPE has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FPE has performed better with a 5.04% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPFF is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FPE.

SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 5.84% for FPE.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FPE and 0.58% for SPFF.

FPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPE and SPFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer