FPCIX vs. VUBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund (FPCIX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX).
FPCIX is managed by Fidelity. VUBFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 24, 2015.
Performance
FPCIX vs. VUBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FPCIX vs. VUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPCIX Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund | -1.19% | 7.42% | 1.71% | 5.98% | -14.76% | -0.81% | 9.39% | 9.20% | -0.33% | 4.73% |
VUBFX Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares | 0.59% | 5.04% | 5.99% | 5.43% | -0.53% | 0.03% | 1.95% | 3.34% | 1.94% | 1.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPCIX achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than VUBFX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FPCIX has underperformed VUBFX with an annualized return of 2.06%, while VUBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.56% annualized return.
FPCIX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
VUBFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FPCIX vs. VUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPCIX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VUBFX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FPCIX vs. VUBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FPCIX
VUBFX
FPCIX vs. VUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund (FPCIX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPCIX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 5.20 | -4.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 10.21 | -8.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 3.61 | -2.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 14.81 | -13.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.11 | 67.09 | -61.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPCIX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 5.20 | -4.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 3.34 | -3.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 3.07 | -2.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 3.06 | -2.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between FPCIX and VUBFX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FPCIX vs. VUBFX - Dividend Comparison
FPCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than VUBFX's 4.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPCIX Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund | 2.84% | 3.83% | 4.17% | 3.55% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 4.99% | 3.75% | 2.94% | 2.70% | 4.13% | 2.45% |
VUBFX Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares | 4.12% | 4.62% | 5.42% | 4.06% | 1.28% | 0.43% | 1.52% | 2.58% | 2.13% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FPCIX vs. VUBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPCIX drawdown since its inception was -19.60%, which is greater than VUBFX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPCIX and VUBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPCIX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.60% | -1.86% | -17.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.14% | -0.30% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.60% | -1.86% | -17.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.60% | -1.86% | -17.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -0.10% | -3.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -0.17% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 0.07% | +0.95% |
Volatility
FPCIX vs. VUBFX - Volatility Comparison
Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund (FPCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX) at 0.34%. This indicates that FPCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FPCIX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 0.34% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 0.55% | +2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.93% | 0.84% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.18% | 0.98% | +5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 0.84% | +4.19% |