FPCIX vs. FTBFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FPCIX (Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund) and FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FPCIX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FTBFX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FPCIX returned 2.04%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FTBFX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FPCIX charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTBFX.

Performance

FPCIX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund (FPCIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FPCIX has underperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 2.04%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.47% annualized return.

FPCIX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: -0.00%
• 6M: -0.00%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 4.12%
• 5Y*: 0.01%
• 10Y*: 2.04%

FTBFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 5.75%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPCIX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPCIX Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund	-0.00%	7.42%	1.71%	5.98%	-14.76%	-0.81%	9.39%	9.20%	-0.33%	4.73%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	0.57%	7.50%	2.13%	7.25%	-13.58%	-0.44%	9.34%	9.89%	-0.66%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FPCIX and FTBFX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007	0.92

The correlation between FPCIX and FTBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FPCIX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPCIX

FPCIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
FPCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FPCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FPCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FPCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FPCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FTBFX

FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPCIX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund (FPCIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FPCIX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.49	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.24	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	1.99	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	6.10	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FPCIX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPCIX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FPCIX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.49	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.13	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.52	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.93	-0.19

Drawdowns

FPCIX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPCIX drawdown since its inception was -19.60%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPCIX and FTBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPCIX	FTBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.60%	-18.25%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-2.89%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.51%	-5.82%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.60%	-18.25%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.60%	-18.25%	-1.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-1.31%	-1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-2.32%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	0.94%	+0.23%

Volatility

FPCIX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund (FPCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.40%. This indicates that FPCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPCIX	FTBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.64%	1.40%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.01%	2.80%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.26%	3.88%	+0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.23%	5.67%	+0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.06%	4.73%	+0.33%

FPCIX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPCIX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPCIX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

FPCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than FTBFX's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPCIX Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund	3.55%	3.83%	4.17%	3.55%	2.69%	3.01%	4.99%	3.75%	2.94%	2.70%	4.13%	2.45%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	4.36%	4.36%	4.15%	4.15%	2.54%	1.89%	5.22%	3.03%	3.19%	2.97%	3.61%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPCIX and FTBFX in my portfolio?

FPCIX and FTBFX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPCIX or FTBFX?

FPCIX has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to FTBFX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPCIX dropped -19.60% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.