PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPCIX vs. STIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPCIX vs. STIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund (FPCIX) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FPCIX has underperformed STIP with an annualized return of 2.04%, while STIP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.18% annualized return.


FPCIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.58%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
-0.00%
1Y
5.21%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
2.04%

STIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPCIX vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPCIX
Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund
-0.00%7.42%1.71%5.98%-14.76%-0.81%9.39%9.20%-0.33%4.73%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.04%6.03%4.77%4.63%-3.02%5.68%5.18%4.89%0.54%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FPCIX and STIP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2010

0.52

The correlation between FPCIX and STIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPCIX vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPCIX
FPCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FPCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FPCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPCIX vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund (FPCIX) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPCIXSTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.69

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

6.76

-4.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

26.37

-19.76

FPCIX vs. STIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the STIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPCIX and STIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPCIXSTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

3.23

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

1.23

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

1.30

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.07

-0.33

Drawdowns

FPCIX vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPCIX drawdown since its inception was -19.60%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPCIX and STIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPCIXSTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.60%

-5.50%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-0.69%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.51%

-0.95%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.60%

-5.50%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.60%

-5.50%

-14.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-0.03%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-0.99%

-2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.18%

+0.99%

Volatility

FPCIX vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund (FPCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.40%. This indicates that FPCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPCIXSTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

0.40%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

0.99%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

1.46%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.23%

2.75%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

2.45%

+2.61%

FPCIX vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPCIX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPCIX vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison

FPCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than STIP's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPCIX
Strategic Advisers Core Income Fund
3.55%3.83%4.17%3.55%2.69%3.01%4.99%3.75%2.94%2.70%4.13%2.45%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
4.30%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPCIX and STIP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPCIX has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to STIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPCIX dropped -19.60% vs STIP's -5.50%.

STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPCIX and STIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer