FPBFX vs. DFRSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX).
FPBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 1, 1986. DFRSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Jan 4, 1993.
Performance
FPBFX vs. DFRSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FPBFX vs. DFRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund | 0.75% | 37.15% | 9.26% | 14.07% | -23.71% | 2.28% | 32.92% | 32.21% | -18.08% | 40.06% |
DFRSX DFA Asia Pacific Small Company | -4.61% | 34.73% | 0.27% | 3.99% | -16.96% | 12.59% | 14.24% | 13.30% | -15.48% | 25.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPBFX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than DFRSX's -4.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FPBFX has outperformed DFRSX with an annualized return of 10.92%, while DFRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.02% annualized return.
FPBFX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -11.66%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 34.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
DFRSX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -12.55%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -2.53%
- 1Y
- 27.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FPBFX vs. DFRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPBFX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than DFRSX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FPBFX vs. DFRSX — Risk / Return Rank
FPBFX
DFRSX
FPBFX vs. DFRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPBFX | DFRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 1.45 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 1.90 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.82 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 6.50 | +2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPBFX | DFRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.45 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.21 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.36 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.32 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FPBFX and DFRSX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FPBFX vs. DFRSX - Dividend Comparison
FPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than DFRSX's 5.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund | 8.13% | 8.19% | 5.99% | 5.36% | 8.76% | 14.97% | 4.45% | 0.75% | 10.88% | 4.36% | 2.38% | 3.61% |
DFRSX DFA Asia Pacific Small Company | 5.15% | 4.92% | 4.66% | 4.70% | 9.99% | 12.82% | 2.91% | 4.56% | 3.48% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.96% |
Drawdowns
FPBFX vs. DFRSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPBFX drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, roughly equal to the maximum DFRSX drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPBFX and DFRSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPBFX | DFRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.06% | -69.06% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -14.20% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.97% | -30.18% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.85% | -46.25% | +6.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.25% | -14.20% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.65% | -17.28% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.97% | -0.47% |
Volatility
FPBFX vs. DFRSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) at 6.08%. This indicates that FPBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FPBFX | DFRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 6.08% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 12.03% | +3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.31% | 18.54% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 17.14% | +1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 16.98% | +0.48% |