FPAS vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FPAS (FPA Short Duration Government ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPAS is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by FPA, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. FPAS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

FPAS vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FPAS

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: -0.79%
• 6M: -0.38%
• 1Y: 2.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPAS vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FPAS FPA Short Duration Government ETF	0.25%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FPAS and BPH is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.39

Return for Risk

FPAS vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPAS

FPAS Risk / Return Rank: 20
FPAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FPAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FPAS Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FPAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FPAS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPAS vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPAS	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.35	—	—

Drawdowns

FPAS vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPAS drawdown since its inception was -2.47%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPAS and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPAS	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-9.43%	+6.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-8.71%	+6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-3.18%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FPAS	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.29%	24.10%	-20.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.12%	24.10%	-19.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.12%	24.10%	-19.98%

FPAS vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPAS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FPAS vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

FPAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than BPH's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%
FPAS FPA Short Duration Government ETF	4.78%	4.75%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPAS and BPH in my portfolio?

FPAS and BPH have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FPAS or BPH?

On fees, FPAS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FPAS or BPH?

FPAS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BPH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FPAS or BPH?

FPAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 0.53% for BPH.

What is the main difference between FPAS and BPH?

FPAS is categorized as Government Bonds, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: FPA and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FPAS and 0.19% for BPH.