FPADX vs. RMBPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) and RMBPX (RMB Japan Fund) are both mutual funds - FPADX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Fidelity, while RMBPX is a Japan Equities fund managed by RMB Funds. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPADX charges 0.07%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RMBPX.

Performance

FPADX vs. RMBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FPADX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 10.70%
• YTD: 30.04%
• 6M: 32.95%
• 1Y: 58.94%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

RMBPX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPADX vs. RMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	30.04%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-18.44%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	-0.24%	-14.03%	19.33%	-14.50%	-2.65%	13.06%	17.64%	-17.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FPADX and RMBPX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2018	0.52

The correlation between FPADX and RMBPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FPADX vs. RMBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPADX vs. RMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FPADX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.23	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.48	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.77	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FPADX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FPADX	RMBPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.26%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FPADX	RMBPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.80%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.11%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.82%	—	—

FPADX vs. RMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPADX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RMBPX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPADX vs. RMBPX - Dividend Comparison

FPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while RMBPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.81%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	4.43%	1.04%	8.11%	0.29%	1.15%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPADX and RMBPX in my portfolio?

FPADX and RMBPX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.