FPADX vs. FEMSX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX).

FPADX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011. FEMSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 9, 2008.

Performance

FPADX vs. FEMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FPADX vs. FEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	3.44%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-14.65%	35.16%
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	5.44%	37.92%	7.84%	14.23%	-23.95%	-5.14%	24.72%	28.87%	-16.20%	49.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPADX achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than FEMSX's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FPADX has underperformed FEMSX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while FEMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.88% annualized return.

FPADX

• 1D: 3.21%
• 1M: -8.18%
• YTD: 3.44%
• 6M: 7.16%
• 1Y: 32.67%
• 3Y*: 15.83%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

FEMSX

• 1D: 3.55%
• 1M: -8.32%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 38.82%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 4.35%
• 10Y*: 10.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPADX vs. FEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPADX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMSX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

FPADX

Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund

FEMSX

Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund

Return for Risk

FPADX vs. FEMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FEMSX

FEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPADX vs. FEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FPADX	FEMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.08	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.68	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.40	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	2.89	-0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.85	11.41	-1.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FPADX vs. FEMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPADX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FEMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPADX and FEMSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FPADX	FEMSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.08	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.23	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.57	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.50	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between FPADX and FEMSX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FPADX vs. FEMSX - Dividend Comparison

FPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than FEMSX's 2.32% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	2.28%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	2.32%	2.45%	2.08%	2.82%	2.39%	12.83%	2.99%	2.48%	9.42%	8.98%	1.46%	1.27%

Drawdowns

FPADX vs. FEMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPADX drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum FEMSX drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPADX and FEMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPADX	FEMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-44.16%	+5.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.28%	-13.42%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.04%	-41.64%	+4.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	-44.16%	+5.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.50%	-10.35%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.39%	-13.52%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.33%	3.40%	-0.07%

Volatility

FPADX vs. FEMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) is 9.56%, while Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) has a volatility of 10.41%. This indicates that FPADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPADX	FEMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.56%	10.41%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.61%	14.73%	-1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.83%	19.16%	-1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	18.65%	-1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	19.13%	-1.50%