PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPACX vs. PTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPACX vs. PTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPACX achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly higher than PTY's -3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FPACX has outperformed PTY with an annualized return of 10.10%, while PTY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.


FPACX

1D
0.20%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.34%
6M
6.34%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
10.10%

PTY

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
-3.77%
6M
-5.18%
1Y
-4.95%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
-0.40%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPACX vs. PTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPACX
FPA Crescent Fund
5.34%17.69%12.42%20.30%-9.20%15.09%12.14%20.03%-7.42%10.38%
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
-3.77%-0.51%19.87%22.56%-18.71%0.40%3.24%35.36%2.49%26.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FPACX and PTY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2002

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPACX vs. PTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPACX
FPACX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FPACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FPACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPACX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PTY
PTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPACX vs. PTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPACXPTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.92

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

-0.32

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

-0.65

+10.46

FPACX vs. PTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPACX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the PTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPACX and PTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPACXPTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

-0.46

+2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

-0.02

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.39

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.46

+0.42

Drawdowns

FPACX vs. PTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPACX drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum PTY drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPACX and PTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPACXPTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-60.86%

+29.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-15.44%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.95%

-16.04%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

-41.38%

+22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.46%

-46.55%

+17.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-12.67%

+12.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-8.61%

+4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

7.60%

-5.66%

Volatility

FPACX vs. PTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) is 2.28%, while PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that FPACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPACXPTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.82%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

7.52%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.66%

10.82%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.88%

17.40%

-5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

21.20%

-8.00%

FPACX vs. PTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPACX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PTY's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPACX vs. PTY - Dividend Comparison

FPACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, less than PTY's 12.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPACX
FPA Crescent Fund
9.11%9.60%7.95%3.72%0.77%11.62%4.80%4.65%8.87%3.70%4.98%6.34%
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
12.04%11.05%9.92%10.77%13.12%9.16%8.74%8.37%10.63%9.48%12.09%11.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPACX and PTY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTY has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to FPACX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPACX dropped -31.60% vs PTY's -60.86%.

FPACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPACX and PTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer