PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPACX vs. HSTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPACX vs. HSTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPACX achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly higher than HSTRX's 4.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FPACX has outperformed HSTRX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while HSTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.18% annualized return.


FPACX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.75%
YTD
5.13%
6M
6.87%
1Y
18.76%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.07%

HSTRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
4.08%
6M
4.60%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
5.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPACX vs. HSTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPACX
FPA Crescent Fund
5.13%17.69%12.42%20.30%-9.20%15.09%12.14%20.03%-7.42%10.38%
HSTRX
Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund
4.08%20.33%6.06%6.04%-6.23%1.21%11.45%11.42%1.48%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FPACX and HSTRX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2002

0.20

The correlation between FPACX and HSTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPACX vs. HSTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPACX
FPACX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FPACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FPACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPACX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

HSTRX
HSTRX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HSTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HSTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPACX vs. HSTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPACXHSTRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

3.07

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.20

4.56

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.64

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

6.63

-4.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.59

18.46

-8.87

FPACX vs. HSTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPACX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the HSTRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPACX and HSTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPACXHSTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

3.07

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.87

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.88

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.86

+0.02

Drawdowns

FPACX vs. HSTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPACX drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, which is greater than HSTRX's maximum drawdown of -13.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPACX and HSTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPACXHSTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-13.53%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-2.42%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.95%

-4.24%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

-13.53%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.46%

-13.53%

-15.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.14%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-2.69%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.87%

+1.07%

Volatility

FPACX vs. HSTRX - Volatility Comparison

FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) at 1.08%. This indicates that FPACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPACXHSTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

1.08%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

2.46%

+4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.68%

5.21%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.88%

6.42%

+5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

5.91%

+7.29%

FPACX vs. HSTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPACX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HSTRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPACX vs. HSTRX - Dividend Comparison

FPACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, more than HSTRX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPACX
FPA Crescent Fund
9.13%9.60%7.95%3.72%0.77%11.62%4.80%4.65%8.87%3.70%4.98%6.34%
HSTRX
Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund
2.36%2.25%2.91%2.54%2.15%1.33%0.52%1.29%1.20%0.37%0.25%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPACX and HSTRX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPACX has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to HSTRX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPACX dropped -31.60% vs HSTRX's -13.53%.

HSTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPACX and HSTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer