FPA vs. EWH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FPA (First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund) and EWH (iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FPA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index while EWH tracks the MSCI Hong Kong 25-50 Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FPA returned 7.79%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for EWH. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FPA charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWH.

Performance

FPA vs. EWH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPA achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than EWH's 10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FPA has outperformed EWH with an annualized return of 7.79%, while EWH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.58% annualized return.

FPA

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -12.59%
• 6M: 3.07%
• YTD: 20.38%
• 1Y: 31.34%
• 3Y*: 20.19%
• 5Y*: 9.35%
• 10Y*: 7.79%
• ALL TIME*: 5.65%

EWH

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 10.27%
• 6M: 0.31%
• YTD: 10.37%
• 1Y: 19.07%
• 3Y*: 10.31%
• 5Y*: 1.39%
• 10Y*: 4.58%
• ALL TIME*: 4.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF	$69.57M	$66.33M	$66.62M
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	$239.16K	$447.30K	$694.81K

FPA vs. EWH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	20.38%	43.16%	3.95%	9.97%	-14.55%	2.98%	13.43%	8.91%	-21.91%	35.81%
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF	10.37%	34.50%	0.00%	-13.87%	-6.81%	-3.49%	4.17%	10.74%	-8.76%	36.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FPA and EWH is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011	0.57

The correlation between FPA and EWH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

FPA vs. EWH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FPA	EWH
Industrials	32.9%	19.8%
Technology	27.9%	-
Financial Services	8.8%	42.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	3.8%
Real Estate	6.2%	17.5%
Energy	4.9%	-
Utilities	4.6%	12.1%
Basic Materials	3.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	2.6%
Communication Services	2.6%	1.8%
Healthcare	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

FPA vs. EWH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FPA

FPA Risk / Return Rank: 39
FPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FPA Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FPA Martin Ratio Rank: 39

EWH

EWH Risk / Return Rank: 38
EWH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
EWH Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
EWH Omega Ratio Rank: 38
EWH Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EWH Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FPA vs. EWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPA	EWH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.02	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.51	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.18	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	1.27	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	3.29	+0.83

FPA vs. EWH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPA Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the EWH Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPA and EWH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FPA vs. EWH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPA drawdown since its inception was -52.91%, smaller than the maximum EWH drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPA and EWH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPA	EWH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.91%	-66.44%	+13.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.40%	-13.41%	-11.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.40%	-23.77%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.03%	-39.37%	+7.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.91%	-42.71%	-10.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.80%	-4.47%	-19.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.48%	-19.43%	+5.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.28%	5.17%	+2.11%

Volatility

FPA vs. EWH - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) at 4.14%. This indicates that FPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPA	EWH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.93%	4.14%	+6.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.24%	12.01%	+16.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.44%	16.70%	+13.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.27%	20.09%	+5.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.98%	19.52%	+3.46%

FPA vs. EWH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EWH's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPA vs. EWH - Dividend Comparison

FPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than EWH's 4.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF	4.49%	5.20%	4.17%	4.28%	2.91%	2.78%	2.56%	2.71%	2.93%	4.35%	3.08%	2.63%
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	4.03%	4.71%	3.40%	3.02%	4.22%	5.12%	1.59%	3.90%	2.81%	3.15%	2.42%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPA and EWH in my portfolio?

FPA and EWH have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPA or EWH?

FPA has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to EWH (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPA dropped -52.91% vs EWH's -66.44%.

Which ETF is better, FPA or EWH?

On 10-year performance, FPA leads with 7.79% vs 4.58% for EWH. On fees, EWH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWH has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FPA or EWH?

Over the 10-year period, FPA has performed better with a 7.79% return vs 4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FPA or EWH?

EWH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FPA or EWH?

EWH has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 4.03% for FPA.

What is the main difference between FPA and EWH?

FPA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index, while EWH tracks MSCI Hong Kong 25-50 Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FPA and 0.50% for EWH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.