FOWF vs. PTLC
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 23.56% vs 17.02% for PTLC. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTLC.
Performance
FOWF vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's 6.30% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 23.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.70%
PTLC
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.21K | $63.68K | $90.22K | |
| $5.24M | $5.46M | $6.01M |
FOWF vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 16.05% | 29.15% | -2.02% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 6.30% | 5.10% | -2.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and PTLC is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FOWF and PTLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
PTLC
FOWF vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOWF | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 1.95 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 7.22 | -0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and PTLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -26.63% | +14.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -8.77% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -5.59% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 2.36% | +1.02% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) at 3.72%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.72% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 9.44% | +2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 12.25% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 11.90% | +4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 13.18% | +3.66% |
FOWF vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than PTLC's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.71% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOWF and PTLC have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FOWF has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to PTLC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOWF dropped -12.29% vs PTLC's -26.63%.
On 1-year performance, FOWF leads with 23.56% vs 17.02% for PTLC. On fees, FOWF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PTLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FOWF has performed better with a 23.56% return vs 17.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FOWF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.
PTLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.71% for FOWF.
FOWF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. FOWF tracks Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FOWF and 0.60% for PTLC.
FOWF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOWF and PTLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer