FOWF vs. ARKX
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while ARKX is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by ARK. FOWF is passively managed, while ARKX is actively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 22.10% vs 69.46% for ARKX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKX.
Performance
FOWF vs. ARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than ARKX's 23.67% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 22.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKX
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 23.67%
- 6M
- 28.83%
- 1Y
- 69.46%
- 3Y*
- 36.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- —
FOWF vs. ARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 9.44% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 23.67% | 48.46% | 2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and ARKX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FOWF and ARKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
FOWF vs. ARKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FOWF
ARKX
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
FOWF
ARKX
Technology
FOWF
ARKX
Communication Services
FOWF
ARKX
Consumer Cyclical
FOWF
ARKX
Basic Materials
FOWF
ARKX
Consumer Defensive
FOWF
-
ARKX
-
Energy
FOWF
-
ARKX
-
Financial Services
FOWF
-
ARKX
-
Healthcare
FOWF
-
ARKX
Real Estate
FOWF
-
ARKX
-
Utilities
FOWF
-
ARKX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. ARKX — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
ARKX
FOWF vs. ARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.33 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.42 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 9.20 | -2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.15 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.43 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. ARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum ARKX drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and ARKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -43.61% | +31.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -20.42% | +10.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -5.03% | +2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -19.99% | +17.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 7.57% | -4.41% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. ARKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is 4.80%, while ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that FOWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 11.01% | -6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 25.01% | -13.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 32.49% | -18.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 27.72% | -10.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 27.42% | -10.53% |
FOWF vs. ARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. ARKX - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while ARKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOWF and ARKX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKX has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to FOWF (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOWF dropped -12.29% vs ARKX's -43.61%.
On 1-year performance, ARKX leads with 69.46% vs 22.10% for FOWF. On fees, FOWF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FOWF has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARKX has performed better with a 69.46% return vs 22.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FOWF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKX.
FOWF has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for ARKX.
FOWF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ARKX is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FOWF and 0.75% for ARKX.
ARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOWF and ARKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer