PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOVL vs. PBTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOVL vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOVL

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PBTP

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.02%
6M
1.41%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.87M$1.40M$1.33M

FOVL vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%6.43%22.87%17.72%-9.39%40.14%-13.20%7.00%
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
1.84%5.98%4.72%4.53%-3.02%5.51%4.89%3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FOVL and PBTP is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

0.09

The correlation between FOVL and PBTP shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOVL vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PBTP
PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOVL vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOVLPBTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

FOVL vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOVL vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOVLPBTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

FOVL vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOVLPBTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.63%

FOVL vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOVL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FOVL vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

FOVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%1.36%2.08%2.59%3.38%2.80%2.88%2.09%0.00%0.00%
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
4.80%3.82%2.59%2.36%5.33%3.12%1.25%2.12%2.33%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOVL and PBTP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FOVL.

PBTP has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 0.00% for FOVL.

FOVL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FOVL tracks MSCI USA IMI Focused Value Factor Index, while PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FOVL and 0.07% for PBTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOVL and PBTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer