FOVL vs. EPMV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FOVL (iShares Focused Value Factor ETF) and EPMV (Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. FOVL is passively managed, while EPMV is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FOVL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPMV.

Performance

FOVL vs. EPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FOVL

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EPMV

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 2.72%
• YTD: 18.03%
• 6M: 16.31%
• 1Y: 27.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOVL vs. EPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FOVL iShares Focused Value Factor ETF	0.00%	10.31%
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	18.03%	14.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FOVL and EPMV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025	0.38

The correlation between FOVL and EPMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FOVL vs. EPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FOVL	EPMV
Financial Services	44.6%	18.7%
Industrials	12.8%	18.3%
Energy	7.7%	4.6%
Utilities	7.5%	2.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	1.5%
Technology	5.0%	15.9%
Healthcare	4.9%	7.7%
Communication Services	4.7%	-
Real Estate	2.6%	6.5%
Basic Materials	-	6.0%

Return for Risk

FOVL vs. EPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EPMV

EPMV Risk / Return Rank: 62
EPMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
EPMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
EPMV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EPMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EPMV Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOVL vs. EPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOVL	EPMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.79	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.63	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.17	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.38	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FOVL	EPMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.78%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.40%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-1.74%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FOVL	EPMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.53%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.59%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.59%	—

FOVL vs. EPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOVL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EPMV's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOVL vs. EPMV - Dividend Comparison

FOVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EPMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	1.25%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FOVL iShares Focused Value Factor ETF	0.00%	1.36%	2.08%	2.59%	3.38%	2.80%	2.88%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOVL and EPMV in my portfolio?

FOVL and EPMV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FOVL or EPMV?

On fees, FOVL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FOVL or EPMV?

FOVL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FOVL or EPMV?

EPMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.00% for FOVL.

What is the main difference between FOVL and EPMV?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FOVL and 0.88% for EPMV.