PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOTO vs. TRUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOTO vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOTO

1D
3.57%
1M
-13.36%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRUT

1D
1.22%
1M
0.47%
6M
17.30%
YTD
17.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOTO vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FOTO and TRUT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOTO vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FOTO vs. TRUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOTO vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOTO drawdown since its inception was -28.53%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTO and TRUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOTOTRUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.53%

-18.55%

-9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.92%

-7.64%

-15.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-5.49%

-9.30%

Volatility

FOTO vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOTOTRUTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.14%

23.33%

+53.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.14%

23.33%

+53.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.14%

23.33%

+53.81%

FOTO vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOTO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOTO vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

FOTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FOTO and TRUT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FOTO.

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for FOTO.

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FOTO and 0.13% for TRUT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOTO and TRUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer