PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCLTX vs. SWYDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCLTX vs. SWYDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX) and Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund (SWYDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLTX achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than SWYDX's 5.86% return.


TCLTX

1D
0.61%
1M
1.36%
YTD
5.00%
6M
5.07%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
6.83%

SWYDX

1D
0.62%
1M
0.99%
YTD
5.86%
6M
5.73%
1Y
14.58%
3Y*
11.04%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCLTX vs. SWYDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCLTX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund
5.00%12.09%8.17%11.68%-13.76%8.19%12.11%17.49%-5.43%12.89%
SWYDX
Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund
5.86%12.60%8.62%14.47%-14.78%10.24%12.37%18.89%-6.38%14.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLTX and SWYDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016

0.96

The correlation between TCLTX and SWYDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCLTX vs. SWYDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCLTX
TCLTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TCLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYDX
SWYDX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SWYDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCLTX vs. SWYDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX) and Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund (SWYDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCLTXSWYDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.93

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

13.00

-1.19

TCLTX vs. SWYDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the SWYDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLTX and SWYDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCLTX vs. SWYDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLTX drawdown since its inception was -44.15%, which is greater than SWYDX's maximum drawdown of -20.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLTX and SWYDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCLTXSWYDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.15%

-20.49%

-23.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.01%

-4.94%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.99%

-7.56%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.99%

-20.43%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-3.41%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.11%

+0.04%

Volatility

TCLTX vs. SWYDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX) is 2.47%, while Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund (SWYDX) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that TCLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWYDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCLTXSWYDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.64%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.18%

5.39%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

6.51%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.69%

9.24%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.36%

9.83%

-1.47%

TCLTX vs. SWYDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLTX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SWYDX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCLTX vs. SWYDX - Dividend Comparison

TCLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than SWYDX's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWYDX
Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund
5.07%5.37%3.41%2.58%2.32%1.92%1.79%1.91%0.00%1.33%0.79%0.00%
TCLTX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund
4.27%4.49%3.33%2.38%5.36%7.49%4.91%3.36%6.53%2.44%5.09%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TCLTX and SWYDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWYDX has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to TCLTX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLTX dropped -44.15% vs SWYDX's -20.49%.

SWYDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCLTX and SWYDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer