PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FONPX vs. ATOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FONPX vs. ATOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund (FONPX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FONPX having a 1.03% return and ATOIX slightly lower at 1.01%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FONPX having a 1.78% annualized return and ATOIX not far ahead at 1.79%.


FONPX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.47%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
1.78%

ATOIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.54%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FONPX vs. ATOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FONPX
Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund
1.03%5.26%0.63%4.76%-6.17%0.01%4.68%5.69%1.29%3.60%
ATOIX
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund
1.01%3.33%3.14%3.27%0.87%-0.04%0.88%1.40%1.54%2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FONPX and ATOIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FONPX vs. ATOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FONPX
FONPX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FONPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FONPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FONPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FONPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FONPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ATOIX
ATOIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ATOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
ATOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FONPX vs. ATOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund (FONPX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FONPXATOIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-13.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

10.98

-9.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

30.48

-28.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

89.66

-81.49

FONPX vs. ATOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FONPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the ATOIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FONPX and ATOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FONPXATOIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

3.50

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

2.80

-2.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

2.28

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

2.47

-1.89

Drawdowns

FONPX vs. ATOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FONPX drawdown since its inception was -10.92%, which is greater than ATOIX's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FONPX and ATOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FONPXATOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.92%

-1.46%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-0.10%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.09%

-0.10%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.92%

-0.37%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.92%

-0.43%

-10.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

0.00%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-0.06%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.03%

+0.72%

Volatility

FONPX vs. ATOIX - Volatility Comparison

Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund (FONPX) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) at 0.20%. This indicates that FONPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FONPXATOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.20%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.77%

0.61%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21%

0.87%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

0.83%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

0.79%

+2.51%

FONPX vs. ATOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FONPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ATOIX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FONPX vs. ATOIX - Dividend Comparison

FONPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than ATOIX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATOIX
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund
2.98%3.27%3.09%3.02%1.07%0.06%0.88%1.39%1.42%2.20%0.61%0.52%
FONPX
Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund
2.62%2.47%2.39%2.39%1.81%1.84%1.92%2.69%3.36%3.55%3.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FONPX and ATOIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FONPX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to ATOIX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FONPX dropped -10.92% vs ATOIX's -1.46%.

ATOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FONPX and ATOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer