PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSFX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOSFX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Overseas Fund (FOSFX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSFX achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 12.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSFX has underperformed FTIHX with an annualized return of 8.72%, while FTIHX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.18% annualized return.


FOSFX

1D
3.75%
1M
-1.54%
6M
2.09%
YTD
5.59%
1Y
10.21%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
8.72%
ALL TIME*
8.59%

FTIHX

1D
2.78%
1M
0.15%
6M
6.94%
YTD
12.99%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
9.18%
ALL TIME*
9.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FOSFX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSFX
Fidelity Overseas Fund
5.59%20.81%5.20%20.56%-24.79%19.32%15.42%28.43%-14.73%28.31%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
12.99%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%25.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSFX and FTIHX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.92

The correlation between FOSFX and FTIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSFX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOSFX
FOSFX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FOSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOSFX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Overseas Fund (FOSFX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOSFXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.30

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.35

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

8.76

-6.48

FOSFX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSFX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOSFX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSFX drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than FTIHX's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSFX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSFXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.51%

-35.75%

-27.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-11.25%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-13.15%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-29.99%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.51%

-35.75%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-2.35%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-7.14%

-9.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.01%

+0.65%

Volatility

FOSFX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Overseas Fund (FOSFX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) at 5.38%. This indicates that FOSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSFXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

5.38%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

14.23%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

16.08%

+2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

15.60%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

15.96%

+1.13%

FOSFX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOSFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOSFX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FOSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than FTIHX's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOSFX
Fidelity Overseas Fund
4.61%4.87%1.38%1.02%0.77%4.54%0.53%1.35%5.92%0.06%1.96%1.06%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.46%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FOSFX and FTIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOSFX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FTIHX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSFX dropped -63.51% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSFX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer