PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSFX vs. FIGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOSFX vs. FIGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Overseas Fund (FOSFX) and Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSFX achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than FIGFX's 12.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSFX has underperformed FIGFX with an annualized return of 9.16%, while FIGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.


FOSFX

1D
1.69%
1M
4.66%
YTD
8.89%
6M
8.91%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
9.16%

FIGFX

1D
2.23%
1M
6.65%
YTD
12.85%
6M
12.75%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOSFX vs. FIGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSFX
Fidelity Overseas Fund
8.89%20.81%5.20%20.56%-24.79%19.32%15.42%28.43%-14.73%28.31%
FIGFX
Fidelity International Growth Fund
12.85%17.91%4.90%20.89%-23.19%15.42%16.95%33.97%-11.52%28.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSFX and FIGFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2007

0.96

The correlation between FOSFX and FIGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSFX vs. FIGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOSFX
FOSFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FOSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FIGFX
FIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOSFX vs. FIGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Overseas Fund (FOSFX) and Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOSFXFIGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.61

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

5.88

-2.01

FOSFX vs. FIGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the FIGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSFX and FIGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOSFX vs. FIGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSFX drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than FIGFX's maximum drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSFX and FIGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSFXFIGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.51%

-55.97%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-13.95%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-16.51%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-34.91%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.51%

-34.91%

-1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-10.38%

-6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.81%

-0.31%

Volatility

FOSFX vs. FIGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Overseas Fund (FOSFX) is 6.57%, while Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that FOSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSFXFIGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

7.43%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

17.09%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

19.32%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

18.31%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

17.92%

-0.63%

FOSFX vs. FIGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FOSFX and FIGFX have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

FOSFX vs. FIGFX - Dividend Comparison

FOSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than FIGFX's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIGFX
Fidelity International Growth Fund
3.05%3.44%0.78%0.48%1.66%1.93%0.11%0.97%0.88%0.12%1.24%0.77%
FOSFX
Fidelity Overseas Fund
4.47%4.87%1.38%1.02%0.77%4.54%0.53%1.35%5.92%0.06%1.96%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FOSFX and FIGFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIGFX has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to FOSFX (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSFX dropped -63.51% vs FIGFX's -55.97%.

FIGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSFX and FIGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer