PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSFX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FOSFX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Overseas Fund (FOSFX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSFX achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSFX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 8.66%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.


FOSFX

1D
0.97%
1M
3.81%
YTD
5.41%
6M
7.39%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
12.53%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
8.66%

^GSPC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.28%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOSFX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSFX
Fidelity Overseas Fund
5.41%20.81%5.20%20.56%-24.79%19.32%15.42%28.43%-14.73%28.31%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.35%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSFX and ^GSPC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 1984

0.56

Over the past year, FOSFX and ^GSPC have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSFX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOSFX
FOSFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FOSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOSFX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Overseas Fund (FOSFX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOSFX^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.41

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

2.93

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

13.52

-11.24

FOSFX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSFX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOSFX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

2.24

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.73

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.76

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.47

-0.01

Drawdowns

FOSFX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSFX drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSFX and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSFX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.51%

-56.78%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-9.10%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-18.90%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-25.43%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.51%

-33.92%

-2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.74%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-10.72%

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

1.97%

+1.50%

Volatility

FOSFX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Overseas Fund (FOSFX) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.93%. This indicates that FOSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSFX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

2.93%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

8.99%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

11.89%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

16.90%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

18.06%

-0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOSFX and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOSFX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to ^GSPC (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSFX dropped -63.51% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSFX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer