VIRC vs. APO
VIRC (Virco Mfg. Corporation) and APO (Apollo Global Management, Inc.) are both stocks. VIRC operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while APO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, VIRC returned 4.43%/yr vs 29.69%/yr for APO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VIRC vs. APO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIRC achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly higher than APO's -5.82% return. Over the past 10 years, VIRC has underperformed APO with an annualized return of 4.43%, while APO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.69% annualized return.
VIRC
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- -3.58%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- -21.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
APO
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- -5.82%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- 1Y
- 2.12%
- 3Y*
- 24.76%
- 5Y*
- 20.75%
- 10Y*
- 29.69%
VIRC vs. APO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIRC Virco Mfg. Corporation | -3.58% | -36.87% | -14.16% | 166.63% | 50.17% | 18.97% | -40.33% | 6.00% | -19.68% | 17.81% |
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | -5.82% | -11.12% | 79.87% | 49.44% | -9.59% | 53.25% | 8.00% | 106.46% | -22.03% | 85.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIRC and APO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011 | 0.12 |
The correlation between VIRC and APO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VIRC:
$96.12M
APO:
$80.45B
VIRC:
-$0.06
APO:
$3.58
VIRC:
0.49
APO:
2.73
VIRC:
0.94
APO:
4.34
VIRC:
$196.59M
APO:
$29.68B
VIRC:
$77.91M
APO:
$26.52B
VIRC:
$3.98M
APO:
$9.28B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIRC vs. APO — Risk / Return Rank
VIRC
APO
VIRC vs. APO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) and Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIRC | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.04 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.06 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 0.13 | -1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIRC vs. APO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIRC drawdown since its inception was -94.51%, which is greater than APO's maximum drawdown of -56.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIRC and APO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIRC | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.51% | -56.99% | -37.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.64% | -34.97% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.55% | -42.82% | -26.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.55% | -42.82% | -26.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.55% | -53.48% | -16.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.35% | -22.60% | -50.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.34% | -16.39% | -48.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.91% | 16.76% | +6.15% |
Volatility
VIRC vs. APO - Volatility Comparison
Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) has a higher volatility of 14.44% compared to Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) at 8.25%. This indicates that VIRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIRC | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.44% | 8.25% | +6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.90% | 27.00% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.13% | 35.30% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.32% | 37.14% | +16.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.97% | 37.85% | +17.12% |
Dividends
VIRC vs. APO - Dividend Comparison
VIRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than APO's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 1.55% | 1.38% | 1.10% | 1.81% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 4.72% | 4.23% | 7.86% | 5.53% | 6.46% | 12.91% |
VIRC Virco Mfg. Corporation | 1.64% | 1.56% | 0.88% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VIRC vs. APO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Virco Mfg. Corporation and Apollo Global Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VIRC vs. APO - Profitability Comparison
VIRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virco Mfg. Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.70M and revenue of 30.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.
APO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
VIRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virco Mfg. Corporation reported an operating income of -3.66M and revenue of 30.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.9%.
APO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
VIRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virco Mfg. Corporation reported a net income of -2.78M and revenue of 30.69M, resulting in a net margin of -9.1%.
APO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a net income of -1.91B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of -38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VIRC and APO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIRC has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to APO (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIRC dropped -94.51% vs APO's -56.99%.
APO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIRC and APO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer