FOPC vs. JPIB
FOPC (Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF) and JPIB (JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOPC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Frontier, while JPIB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FOPC returned 4.70% vs 5.13% for JPIB. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOPC charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for JPIB.
Performance
FOPC vs. JPIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOPC achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than JPIB's 0.74% return.
FOPC
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPIB
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FOPC vs. JPIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF | 0.46% | 6.54% | -0.00% |
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 0.74% | 8.19% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOPC and JPIB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FOPC and JPIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOPC vs. JPIB — Risk / Return Rank
FOPC
JPIB
FOPC vs. JPIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOPC | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.37 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 4.78 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOPC | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.46 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.57 | 0.82 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
FOPC vs. JPIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOPC drawdown since its inception was -2.18%, smaller than the maximum JPIB drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOPC and JPIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOPC | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -13.13% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.18% | -3.75% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -1.12% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -1.93% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 1.07% | -0.43% |
Volatility
FOPC vs. JPIB - Volatility Comparison
Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) have volatilities of 1.03% and 1.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOPC | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 1.08% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 3.00% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 3.53% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.10% | 4.11% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.10% | 4.44% | -1.34% |
FOPC vs. JPIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOPC has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than JPIB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOPC vs. JPIB - Dividend Comparison
FOPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than JPIB's 5.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF | 4.27% | 4.42% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 5.02% | 4.85% | 4.57% | 4.35% | 3.10% | 2.59% | 3.14% | 4.66% | 5.83% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOPC and JPIB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPIB has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to FOPC (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOPC dropped -2.18% vs JPIB's -13.13%.
On 1-year performance, JPIB leads with 5.13% vs 4.70% for FOPC. On fees, JPIB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JPIB has performed better with a 5.13% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPIB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FOPC.
JPIB has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 4.27% for FOPC.
FOPC is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while JPIB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FOPC and 0.50% for JPIB.
FOPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOPC and JPIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer