FOPAX vs. LZISX

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

FOPAX (Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A) and LZISX (Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FOPAX returned 9.12%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for LZISX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FOPAX charges 1.52%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for LZISX.

Performance

FOPAX vs. LZISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOPAX achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than LZISX's 25.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FOPAX has outperformed LZISX with an annualized return of 9.12%, while LZISX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.06% annualized return.

FOPAX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -0.35%
• 6M: 6.62%
• YTD: 6.57%
• 1Y: 10.80%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: 4.35%
• 10Y*: 9.12%

LZISX

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -1.19%
• 6M: 23.43%
• YTD: 25.87%
• 1Y: 35.87%
• 3Y*: 20.03%
• 5Y*: 6.16%
• 10Y*: 8.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOPAX vs. LZISX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FOPAX Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A	6.57%	24.63%	3.83%	16.64%	-29.16%	17.32%	19.26%	28.71%	-14.35%	34.63%
LZISX Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio	25.87%	35.95%	-3.68%	11.59%	-26.34%	12.36%	13.45%	25.49%	-24.90%	36.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FOPAX and LZISX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2005	0.88

The correlation between FOPAX and LZISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FOPAX vs. LZISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOPAX

FOPAX Risk / Return Rank: 14
FOPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FOPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FOPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FOPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FOPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

LZISX

LZISX Risk / Return Rank: 68
LZISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LZISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LZISX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
LZISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LZISX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOPAX vs. LZISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOPAX	LZISX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.80	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	2.45	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.31	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	3.02	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.18	11.57	-8.39

FOPAX vs. LZISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOPAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the LZISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOPAX and LZISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FOPAX vs. LZISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOPAX drawdown since its inception was -72.76%, which is greater than LZISX's maximum drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOPAX and LZISX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOPAX	LZISX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.76%	-65.43%	-7.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-12.10%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.66%	-15.88%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.92%	-42.01%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.92%	-44.80%	+3.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	-3.68%	+1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.91%	-14.75%	-4.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	3.16%	+0.24%

Volatility

FOPAX vs. LZISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) is 4.60%, while Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that FOPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOPAX	LZISX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	7.73%	-3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.54%	16.77%	-5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.97%	20.33%	-6.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	17.81%	-0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.88%	16.95%	-1.07%

FOPAX vs. LZISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOPAX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than LZISX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOPAX vs. LZISX - Dividend Comparison

FOPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.26%, more than LZISX's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FOPAX Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A	11.26%	12.00%	6.24%	3.48%	6.51%	8.83%	0.00%	0.81%	2.66%	1.27%	1.10%	0.47%
LZISX Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio	1.52%	1.91%	1.89%	2.08%	5.44%	36.78%	2.07%	2.10%	4.62%	0.00%	2.96%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOPAX and LZISX in my portfolio?

FOPAX and LZISX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FOPAX or LZISX?

LZISX has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to FOPAX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOPAX dropped -72.76% vs LZISX's -65.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.