FOPAX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FOPAX (Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FOPAX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FOPAX returned 8.70%/yr vs 21.79%/yr for FBGRX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOPAX charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FOPAX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOPAX achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FOPAX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.

FOPAX

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 7.00%
• 6M: 9.94%
• 1Y: 15.82%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: 4.51%
• 10Y*: 8.70%

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 8.31%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 6M: 18.83%
• 1Y: 45.12%
• 3Y*: 32.21%
• 5Y*: 16.60%
• 10Y*: 21.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOPAX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FOPAX Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A	7.00%	24.63%	3.83%	16.64%	-29.16%	17.32%	19.26%	28.71%	-14.35%	34.63%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	17.66%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FOPAX and FBGRX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2005	0.66

The correlation between FOPAX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FOPAX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOPAX

FOPAX Risk / Return Rank: 18
FOPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FOPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FOPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FOPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FOPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOPAX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FOPAX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.67	-1.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	3.42	-1.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.45	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	3.62	-2.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.07	15.38	-10.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FOPAX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOPAX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FOPAX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	2.67	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.67	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.92	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.68	-0.32

Drawdowns

FOPAX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOPAX drawdown since its inception was -72.76%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOPAX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOPAX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.76%	-58.64%	-14.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-12.65%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.79%	-27.07%	+12.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.92%	-43.08%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.92%	-43.08%	+2.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	0.00%	-1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.98%	-12.53%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	2.98%	+0.33%

Volatility

FOPAX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOPAX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	4.14%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.89%	12.99%	-2.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.73%	17.46%	-3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	24.88%	-8.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.11%	23.69%	-7.58%

FOPAX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOPAX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOPAX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FOPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.61%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FOPAX Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A	11.22%	12.00%	6.24%	3.48%	6.51%	8.83%	0.00%	0.81%	2.66%	1.27%	1.10%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOPAX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FOPAX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FOPAX or FBGRX?

FOPAX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to FBGRX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOPAX dropped -72.76% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.