PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOPAX vs. BISAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOPAX vs. BISAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOPAX achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than BISAX's 7.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FOPAX has underperformed BISAX with an annualized return of 8.72%, while BISAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.


FOPAX

1D
1.98%
1M
-0.40%
6M
3.05%
YTD
6.15%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
8.72%
ALL TIME*
6.90%

BISAX

1D
1.47%
1M
7.60%
6M
3.33%
YTD
7.90%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FOPAX vs. BISAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOPAX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A
6.15%24.63%3.83%16.64%-29.16%17.32%19.26%28.71%-14.35%34.63%
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
7.90%45.50%23.18%39.03%-8.68%18.39%4.62%6.80%-20.13%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FOPAX and BISAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2012

0.77

The correlation between FOPAX and BISAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOPAX vs. BISAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOPAX
FOPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FOPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FOPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BISAX
BISAX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BISAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BISAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOPAX vs. BISAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOPAXBISAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.20

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

1.20

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.31

2.77

+0.54

FOPAX vs. BISAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOPAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the BISAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOPAX and BISAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOPAX vs. BISAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOPAX drawdown since its inception was -72.76%, which is greater than BISAX's maximum drawdown of -47.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOPAX and BISAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOPAXBISAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.76%

-47.30%

-25.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-11.63%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

-11.63%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.92%

-31.44%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.92%

-47.30%

+6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-1.00%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.85%

-8.04%

-10.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

5.03%

-1.54%

Volatility

FOPAX vs. BISAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) at 3.44%. This indicates that FOPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BISAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOPAXBISAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.44%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

10.76%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

12.86%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

13.89%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

14.13%

+1.75%

FOPAX vs. BISAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOPAX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BISAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOPAX vs. BISAX - Dividend Comparison

FOPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.30%, more than BISAX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
3.41%3.23%3.06%2.81%3.87%3.46%0.81%0.66%3.88%8.33%4.00%3.44%
FOPAX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A
11.30%12.00%6.24%3.48%6.51%8.83%0.00%0.81%2.66%1.27%1.10%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOPAX and BISAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOPAX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to BISAX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOPAX dropped -72.76% vs BISAX's -47.30%.

BISAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOPAX and BISAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer