PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOGLX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOGLX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6 (FOGLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOGLX achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 10.86% return.


FOGLX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.39%
6M
6.31%
YTD
6.31%
1Y
12.74%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*

JRLVX

1D
-0.66%
1M
-1.30%
6M
10.86%
YTD
10.86%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOGLX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6
6.31%14.85%11.48%12.62%-15.90%8.90%13.38%18.91%-4.85%6.48%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
10.86%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FOGLX and JRLVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FOGLX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOGLX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOGLX
FOGLX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FOGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FOGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOGLX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6 (FOGLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOGLXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.56

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

10.99

-1.14

FOGLX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOGLX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOGLX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOGLX drawdown since its inception was -22.47%, smaller than the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOGLX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOGLXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.47%

-32.53%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-8.50%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.67%

-15.27%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-25.64%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.30%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-4.54%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.98%

-0.67%

Volatility

FOGLX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6 (FOGLX) is 3.35%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that FOGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOGLXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

5.10%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.50%

10.05%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.50%

12.07%

-4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.13%

14.91%

-5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.38%

15.95%

-6.57%

FOGLX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOGLX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOGLX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

FOGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than JRLVX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6
8.21%8.23%8.93%2.68%9.30%11.10%7.27%7.11%9.89%4.63%0.00%0.00%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.21%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FOGLX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to FOGLX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOGLX dropped -22.47% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOGLX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer