FOF vs. LPXZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX).
FOF is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Nov 24, 2006. LPXZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Nov 29, 2015.
Performance
FOF vs. LPXZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FOF vs. LPXZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | -0.96% | 13.01% | 23.65% | 17.90% | -22.69% | 28.24% | 1.52% | 31.37% | -9.43% | 23.41% |
LPXZX Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund | -0.77% | 6.89% | 8.75% | 6.91% | -5.78% | 2.08% | 4.27% | 11.38% | -1.44% | 5.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOF achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than LPXZX's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FOF has outperformed LPXZX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while LPXZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.14% annualized return.
FOF
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 15.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
LPXZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FOF vs. LPXZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LPXZX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FOF vs. LPXZX — Risk / Return Rank
FOF
LPXZX
FOF vs. LPXZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOF | LPXZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 2.05 | -1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.58 | -1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.52 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 2.11 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 8.95 | -4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOF | LPXZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.05 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 1.28 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 1.10 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.05 | -0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between FOF and LPXZX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FOF vs. LPXZX - Dividend Comparison
FOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than LPXZX's 4.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | 8.14% | 7.91% | 8.22% | 9.32% | 9.99% | 7.06% | 8.41% | 7.78% | 9.41% | 7.84% | 8.90% | 9.49% |
LPXZX Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund | 4.59% | 4.84% | 5.10% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 4.21% | 4.36% | 4.51% | 4.71% | 3.78% | 4.10% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FOF vs. LPXZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOF drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than LPXZX's maximum drawdown of -18.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOF and LPXZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOF | LPXZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.38% | -18.13% | -41.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -2.14% | -12.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.96% | -9.69% | -20.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.74% | -18.13% | -31.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.52% | -2.14% | -11.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -1.50% | -7.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 0.50% | +3.23% |
Volatility
FOF vs. LPXZX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX) at 0.87%. This indicates that FOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LPXZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOF | LPXZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 0.87% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 1.40% | +9.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 2.23% | +16.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 2.68% | +15.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 3.77% | +16.48% |