FOF vs. CSZIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX).
FOF is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Nov 24, 2006. CSZIX is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Oct 1, 2014.
Performance
FOF vs. CSZIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FOF vs. CSZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | -0.96% | 13.01% | 23.65% | 17.90% | -22.69% | 28.24% | 1.52% | 31.37% | -9.43% | 23.41% |
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 1.50% | 4.41% | 6.81% | 13.26% | -26.21% | 41.81% | -1.64% | 31.95% | -4.17% | 8.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOF achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than CSZIX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FOF has outperformed CSZIX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while CSZIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.42% annualized return.
FOF
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 15.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
CSZIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FOF vs. CSZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CSZIX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FOF vs. CSZIX — Risk / Return Rank
FOF
CSZIX
FOF vs. CSZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOF | CSZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.20 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 0.38 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.05 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 0.27 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 1.07 | +2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOF | CSZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.20 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.24 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.31 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.33 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FOF and CSZIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FOF vs. CSZIX - Dividend Comparison
FOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than CSZIX's 3.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | 8.14% | 7.91% | 8.22% | 9.32% | 9.99% | 7.06% | 8.41% | 7.78% | 9.41% | 7.84% | 8.90% | 9.49% |
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 3.10% | 3.81% | 2.85% | 3.00% | 7.77% | 4.38% | 5.47% | 7.70% | 3.68% | 2.60% | 5.90% | 22.32% |
Drawdowns
FOF vs. CSZIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOF drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than CSZIX's maximum drawdown of -42.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOF and CSZIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOF | CSZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.38% | -42.71% | -16.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -11.83% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.96% | -33.05% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.74% | -42.71% | -7.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.52% | -7.65% | -5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -8.89% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 2.96% | +0.77% |
Volatility
FOF vs. CSZIX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) at 4.31%. This indicates that FOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOF | CSZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 4.31% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 9.44% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 15.96% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 18.67% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 20.79% | -0.54% |