FOCPX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
FOCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1984. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
FOCPX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FOCPX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCPX Fidelity OTC Portfolio | -7.78% | 22.21% | 38.95% | 42.64% | -32.08% | 24.94% | 46.75% | 39.20% | -3.30% | -1.27% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOCPX achieves a -7.78% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
FOCPX
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -8.65%
- YTD
- -7.78%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- 26.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 19.21%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FOCPX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOCPX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FOCPX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
FOCPX
SWLGX
FOCPX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOCPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.66 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 1.10 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 0.72 | +1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 2.51 | +5.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOCPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.66 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.68 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FOCPX and SWLGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FOCPX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
FOCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCPX Fidelity OTC Portfolio | 8.43% | 7.78% | 16.76% | 0.05% | 4.06% | 11.53% | 6.23% | 7.58% | 7.93% | 4.86% | 3.24% | 5.41% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FOCPX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOCPX drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCPX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOCPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.25% | -32.69% | -37.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -16.16% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.05% | -32.69% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.29% | -16.16% | +4.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.08% | -7.13% | -9.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 4.62% | -1.60% |
Volatility
FOCPX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that FOCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOCPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 5.38% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 11.82% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.69% | 22.31% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 21.47% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 22.78% | -0.46% |