FOCKX vs. RYGRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FOCKX (Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K) and RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FOCKX returned 23.26%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for RYGRX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FOCKX charges 0.73%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYGRX.

Performance

FOCKX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCKX achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 33.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FOCKX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 23.26%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.

FOCKX

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 29.57%
• 6M: 29.94%
• 1Y: 60.92%
• 3Y*: 34.63%
• 5Y*: 19.05%
• 10Y*: 23.26%

RYGRX

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: 8.71%
• YTD: 33.25%
• 6M: 30.14%
• 1Y: 41.89%
• 3Y*: 25.56%
• 5Y*: 10.73%
• 10Y*: 13.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOCKX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K	29.57%	22.28%	38.91%	42.92%	-32.07%	25.06%	46.83%	39.36%	-3.18%	38.78%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	33.25%	11.00%	25.73%	5.80%	-28.71%	26.61%	26.34%	34.13%	-6.28%	23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FOCKX and RYGRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008	0.89

The correlation between FOCKX and RYGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FOCKX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOCKX

FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

RYGRX

RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 62
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOCKX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOCKX	RYGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.13	1.97	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	2.66	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.34	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.40	3.79	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.89	14.10	+8.79

FOCKX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOCKX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOCKX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FOCKX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCKX drawdown since its inception was -53.33%, roughly equal to the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCKX and RYGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOCKX	RYGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.33%	-54.22%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.28%	-11.17%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.83%	-24.95%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.97%	-36.57%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.97%	-36.63%	-0.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.17%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-9.39%	+1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	2.99%	-0.34%

Volatility

FOCKX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) is 8.83%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that FOCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOCKX	RYGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.83%	9.93%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	18.47%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.46%	21.50%	-2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.94%	23.82%	-0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.58%	23.04%	-0.46%

FOCKX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCKX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOCKX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

FOCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than RYGRX's 3.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K	5.83%	7.56%	16.42%	0.09%	3.97%	11.34%	6.18%	7.49%	7.81%	4.85%	3.25%	5.42%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	3.82%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.81%	4.43%	12.10%	7.15%	6.26%	0.05%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOCKX and RYGRX in my portfolio?

FOCKX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FOCKX or RYGRX?

RYGRX has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to FOCKX (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCKX dropped -53.33% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.