FNY vs. SPMO
FNY (First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNY returned 13.68%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for SPMO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
FNY vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNY achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FNY has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 13.68%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.95% annualized return.
FNY
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
FNY vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 14.89% | 14.03% | 18.09% | 21.13% | -23.80% | 13.46% | 36.97% | 32.54% | -7.53% | 25.12% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNY and SPMO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FNY and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNY vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNY
SPMO
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Industrials
FNY
SPMO
Healthcare
FNY
SPMO
Technology
FNY
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
FNY
SPMO
Financial Services
FNY
SPMO
Real Estate
FNY
SPMO
Communication Services
FNY
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
FNY
SPMO
Energy
FNY
SPMO
Basic Materials
FNY
SPMO
Utilities
FNY
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNY vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
FNY
SPMO
FNY vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNY | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.47 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 3.64 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.30 | 14.17 | -4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNY | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.62 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 1.27 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 1.03 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.01 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
FNY vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNY drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNY and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNY | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.91% | -30.95% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.01% | -12.70% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.97% | -20.13% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.94% | -22.74% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.91% | -30.95% | -7.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | 0.00% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -4.60% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.26% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FNY vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) is 6.61%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that FNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNY | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 7.35% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.04% | 14.39% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 17.64% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 19.30% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 20.31% | +2.03% |
FNY vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNY vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
FNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.56% | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.06% | 0.21% | 0.60% | 0.46% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNY and SPMO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to FNY (6.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNY dropped -38.91% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.95% vs 13.68% for FNY. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FNY has been the lower-risk option at 6.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 13.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNY.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.03% for FNY.
FNY is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. FNY tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNY and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNY and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer