FNY vs. QQJG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNY (First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and QQJG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - FNY tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index while QQJG tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNY returned 19.96%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for QQJG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQJG.

Performance

FNY vs. QQJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNY achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than QQJG's 1.44% return.

FNY

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: 14.89%
• 6M: 14.12%
• 1Y: 30.64%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

QQJG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 18.92%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNY vs. QQJG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	14.89%	14.03%	18.09%	21.13%	-23.80%	-0.51%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	1.44%	18.05%	14.67%	17.20%	-27.69%	0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FNY and QQJG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between FNY and QQJG has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FNY vs. QQJG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNY	QQJG
Industrials	25.4%	6.4%
Healthcare	18.6%	18.2%
Technology	17.5%	44.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	14.3%
Financial Services	9.4%	0.1%
Real Estate	6.1%	-
Communication Services	3.6%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	3.4%
Energy	2.0%	1.6%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.5%
Utilities	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

FNY vs. QQJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNY

FNY Risk / Return Rank: 47
FNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FNY Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FNY Martin Ratio Rank: 54

QQJG

QQJG Risk / Return Rank: 45
QQJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
QQJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QQJG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
QQJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QQJG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNY vs. QQJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNY	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.37	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.97	+0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.29	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	2.42	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.30	8.87	+0.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNY vs. QQJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the QQJG Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNY and QQJG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNY	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	1.37	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.17	+0.39

Drawdowns

FNY vs. QQJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNY drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, which is greater than QQJG's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNY and QQJG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNY	QQJG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.91%	-36.76%	-2.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.01%	-7.93%	-4.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.97%	-23.48%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-2.09%	+1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.60%	-15.32%	+7.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	2.15%	+1.15%

Volatility

FNY vs. QQJG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) at 0.00%. This indicates that FNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNY	QQJG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.61%	0.00%	+6.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.04%	8.32%	+6.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.91%	14.05%	+5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.30%	21.70%	+0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.34%	21.70%	+0.64%

FNY vs. QQJG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QQJG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNY vs. QQJG - Dividend Comparison

FNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than QQJG's 13.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	0.03%	0.03%	0.56%	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.25%	0.28%	0.06%	0.21%	0.60%	0.46%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	13.86%	0.68%	0.65%	0.54%	0.70%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNY and QQJG in my portfolio?

FNY and QQJG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNY or QQJG?

FNY has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to QQJG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNY dropped -38.91% vs QQJG's -36.76%.

Which ETF is better, FNY or QQJG?

On 3-year performance, FNY leads with 19.96% vs 14.09% for QQJG. On fees, QQJG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQJG has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNY or QQJG?

Over the 3-year period, FNY has performed better with a 19.96% return vs 14.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNY or QQJG?

QQJG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNY or QQJG?

QQJG has the higher dividend yield at 13.86%, compared with 0.03% for FNY.

What is the main difference between FNY and QQJG?

FNY tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index, while QQJG tracks Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNY and 0.20% for QQJG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.