PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNX vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNX vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNX achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 18.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FNX has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 13.03%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.80% annualized return.


FNX

1D
0.99%
1M
3.25%
YTD
15.76%
6M
13.36%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
13.03%

TDIV

1D
0.27%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
18.34%
6M
16.95%
1Y
30.30%
3Y*
28.15%
5Y*
17.11%
10Y*
18.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNX vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
15.76%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%17.66%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
18.34%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FNX and TDIV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012

0.76

The correlation between FNX and TDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNX vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNX
TDIV

Financial Services

18.7%

-

Industrials

18.2%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%

-

Technology

13.3%
87.1%

Healthcare

10.1%

-

Real Estate

7.1%

-

Energy

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Communication Services

2.4%
11.6%

Financial Services

FNX
18.7%
TDIV

-

Industrials

FNX
18.2%
TDIV
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FNX
15.4%
TDIV

-

Technology

FNX
13.3%
TDIV
87.1%

Healthcare

FNX
10.1%
TDIV

-

Real Estate

FNX
7.1%
TDIV

-

Energy

FNX
5.7%
TDIV

-

Basic Materials

FNX
3.2%
TDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

FNX
3.2%
TDIV

-

Utilities

FNX
2.8%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

FNX
2.4%
TDIV
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNX vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNX vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNXTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

2.68

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

7.40

+3.71

FNX vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNX and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNX vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNXTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-31.97%

-25.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-11.35%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.97%

-23.00%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-31.97%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.95%

-31.97%

-11.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.99%

+10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-4.86%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

4.10%

-1.42%

Volatility

FNX vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) is 4.45%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that FNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNXTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

10.08%

-5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

15.68%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

19.88%

-3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.51%

20.97%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

20.96%

+0.99%

FNX vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNX vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than TDIV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.99%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.61%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNX and TDIV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to FNX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.80% vs 13.03% for FNX. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FNX has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.80% return vs 13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FNX.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.99% for FNX.

FNX is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FNX and 0.50% for TDIV.

FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNX and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer