PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNX vs. PTMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNX vs. PTMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNX achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly lower than PTMC's 14.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FNX has outperformed PTMC with an annualized return of 11.90%, while PTMC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.17% annualized return.


FNX

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.71%
YTD
11.81%
6M
11.61%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
11.90%

PTMC

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.83%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.26%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
6.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNX vs. PTMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
11.81%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%17.66%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
14.07%-1.55%13.22%7.29%-13.99%12.42%6.58%1.04%0.02%17.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FNX and PTMC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.77

The correlation between FNX and PTMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (5 years) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNX vs. PTMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNX
PTMC

Industrials

19.3%
23.6%

Financial Services

18.6%
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
10.8%

Healthcare

10.4%
8.8%

Technology

9.5%
16.4%

Real Estate

8.6%
7.0%

Energy

6.2%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.9%

Utilities

2.7%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.2%
1.4%

Industrials

FNX
19.3%
PTMC
23.6%

Financial Services

FNX
18.6%
PTMC
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FNX
14.4%
PTMC
10.8%

Healthcare

FNX
10.4%
PTMC
8.8%

Technology

FNX
9.5%
PTMC
16.4%

Real Estate

FNX
8.6%
PTMC
7.0%

Energy

FNX
6.2%
PTMC
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

FNX
4.0%
PTMC
4.8%

Basic Materials

FNX
3.1%
PTMC
4.9%

Utilities

FNX
2.7%
PTMC
3.0%

Communication Services

FNX
2.2%
PTMC
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNX vs. PTMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNX vs. PTMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNXPTMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.16

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

7.90

+2.05

FNX vs. PTMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the PTMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNX and PTMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNXPTMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.26

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.29

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.48

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.51

-0.09

Drawdowns

FNX vs. PTMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than PTMC's maximum drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and PTMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNXPTMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-20.53%

-36.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-8.89%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.97%

-15.31%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-16.93%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.95%

-20.53%

-23.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.05%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-6.47%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.42%

+0.26%

Volatility

FNX vs. PTMC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNXPTMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

4.41%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

11.43%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

15.17%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

13.15%

+7.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

12.98%

+8.99%

FNX vs. PTMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNX and PTMC have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

FNX vs. PTMC - Dividend Comparison

FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than PTMC's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.83%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.61%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FNX and PTMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to PTMC (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs PTMC's -20.53%.

On 10-year performance, FNX leads with 11.90% vs 6.17% for PTMC. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PTMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNX has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNX and PTMC have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.83% for FNX.

FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index, while PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer.

FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNX and PTMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer