PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNPIX vs. DRCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNPIX vs. DRCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) and Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNPIX achieves a -10.35% return, which is significantly lower than DRCVX's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FNPIX has outperformed DRCVX with an annualized return of 13.42%, while DRCVX has yielded a comparatively lower -4.13% annualized return.


FNPIX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
-10.35%
6M
-7.10%
1Y
-1.81%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
13.42%

DRCVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
3.17%
6M
3.32%
1Y
9.66%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
-4.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNPIX vs. DRCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
-10.35%16.39%38.51%18.34%-23.84%57.11%-9.83%46.49%-17.23%27.19%
DRCVX
Comstock Capital Value Fund
3.17%11.55%2.02%6.55%4.13%-2.16%-5.36%-25.76%7.76%-20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FNPIX and DRCVX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2000

-0.61

The correlation between FNPIX and DRCVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.61 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNPIX vs. DRCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNPIX
FNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

DRCVX
DRCVX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DRCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DRCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNPIX vs. DRCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) and Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNPIXDRCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.84

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

11.47

-11.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.18

41.31

-41.49

FNPIX vs. DRCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNPIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the DRCVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNPIX and DRCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNPIXDRCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

3.41

-3.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

1.13

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

-0.42

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

-0.01

+0.10

Drawdowns

FNPIX vs. DRCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNPIX drawdown since its inception was -93.14%, roughly equal to the maximum DRCVX drawdown of -97.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNPIX and DRCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNPIXDRCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.14%

-97.47%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.37%

-0.89%

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.21%

-3.82%

-19.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.80%

-4.08%

-33.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.23%

-54.27%

-3.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.16%

-96.61%

+82.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-65.89%

+29.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.95%

0.25%

+8.70%

Volatility

FNPIX vs. DRCVX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) at 0.63%. This indicates that FNPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNPIXDRCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

0.63%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.23%

1.81%

+14.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

3.02%

+18.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

4.56%

+22.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.65%

9.80%

+20.85%

FNPIX vs. DRCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNPIX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than DRCVX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNPIX vs. DRCVX - Dividend Comparison

FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DRCVX
Comstock Capital Value Fund
1.90%1.96%0.00%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
0.00%0.00%0.49%0.25%0.00%13.10%0.00%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNPIX and DRCVX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNPIX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to DRCVX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNPIX dropped -93.14% vs DRCVX's -97.47%.

DRCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNPIX and DRCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer