DRCVX vs. RYTPX
DRCVX (Comstock Capital Value Fund) and RYTPX (Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DRCVX returned -3.72%/yr vs -16.47%/yr for RYTPX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DRCVX charges 0.00%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for RYTPX.
Performance
DRCVX vs. RYTPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRCVX achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly higher than RYTPX's -13.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DRCVX has outperformed RYTPX with an annualized return of -3.72%, while RYTPX has yielded a comparatively lower -16.47% annualized return.
DRCVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.26%
- 10Y*
- -3.72%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.82%
RYTPX
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- -11.47%
- YTD
- -13.45%
- 1Y
- -26.44%
- 3Y*
- -24.84%
- 5Y*
- -20.33%
- 10Y*
- -16.47%
- ALL TIME*
- -21.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
DRCVX vs. RYTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRCVX Comstock Capital Value Fund | 3.17% | 11.55% | 2.02% | 6.55% | 4.13% | -2.16% | -5.36% | -25.76% | 7.76% | -20.58% |
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund | -13.45% | -27.24% | -29.24% | -31.96% | 29.31% | -43.38% | -50.05% | -41.84% | 4.42% | -32.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRCVX and RYTPX is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.65 |
The correlation between DRCVX and RYTPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.56 (5 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRCVX vs. RYTPX — Risk / Return Rank
DRCVX
RYTPX
DRCVX vs. RYTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRCVX | RYTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 0.86 | +0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.17 | -0.78 | +7.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.00 | -1.31 | +26.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRCVX vs. RYTPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRCVX drawdown since its inception was -97.47%, roughly equal to the maximum RYTPX drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRCVX and RYTPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRCVX | RYTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.47% | -99.92% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.89% | -29.99% | +29.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.82% | -68.03% | +64.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.08% | -75.66% | +71.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.21% | -96.13% | +46.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.61% | -99.92% | +3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.00% | -82.40% | +16.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 17.99% | -17.73% |
Volatility
DRCVX vs. RYTPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) is 0.74%, while Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that DRCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRCVX | RYTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 6.85% | -6.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.95% | 20.21% | -18.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81% | 25.68% | -22.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 33.98% | -29.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.42% | 238.76% | -229.34% |
DRCVX vs. RYTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRCVX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RYTPX's 2.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRCVX vs. RYTPX - Dividend Comparison
DRCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than RYTPX's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRCVX Comstock Capital Value Fund | 1.90% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYTPX Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund | 5.95% | 5.15% | 6.90% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRCVX and RYTPX have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYTPX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to DRCVX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRCVX dropped -97.47% vs RYTPX's -99.92%.
DRCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRCVX and RYTPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer