FNITX vs. QQQX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FNITX (Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M) and QQQX (Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund) are both mutual funds - FNITX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while QQQX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nuveen. Over the past 10 years, FNITX returned 16.83%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for QQQX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNITX charges 1.18%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QQQX.

Performance

FNITX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNITX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FNITX has outperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 16.83%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.43% annualized return.

FNITX

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 10.71%
• 1Y: 27.56%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 15.00%
• 10Y*: 16.83%

QQQX

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: 7.43%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 25.88%
• 3Y*: 14.83%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: 13.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNITX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNITX Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M	11.69%	22.36%	34.61%	35.61%	-26.67%	24.10%	23.30%	28.81%	-4.89%	27.76%
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	7.43%	14.87%	25.61%	21.68%	-27.39%	25.32%	15.75%	28.83%	-11.68%	39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FNITX and QQQX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007	0.74

The correlation between FNITX and QQQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNITX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNITX

FNITX Risk / Return Rank: 52
FNITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FNITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FNITX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FNITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FNITX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

QQQX

QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 50
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNITX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNITX	QQQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.72	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.45	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.32	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	2.85	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.02	12.24	-0.22

FNITX vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNITX and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNITX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNITX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNITX and QQQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNITX	QQQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.84%	-57.25%	+7.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-9.11%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.11%	-22.80%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.06%	-29.33%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.06%	-35.96%	+3.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.36%	-5.62%	+3.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.32%	-8.01%	+0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	2.12%	+0.28%

Volatility

FNITX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) at 6.07%. This indicates that FNITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNITX	QQQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	6.07%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	12.46%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.51%	15.14%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.24%	19.94%	-0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.38%	21.11%	-1.73%

FNITX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNITX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNITX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

FNITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%, more than QQQX's 8.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNITX Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M	9.16%	11.08%	6.33%	6.43%	18.00%	13.42%	8.54%	6.62%	14.33%	7.86%	4.99%	4.45%
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	8.45%	7.85%	6.73%	7.26%	9.66%	5.85%	6.00%	6.49%	8.40%	5.95%	7.54%	7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNITX and QQQX in my portfolio?

FNITX and QQQX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNITX or QQQX?

FNITX has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to QQQX (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNITX dropped -49.84% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNITX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.