PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNITX vs. MRFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNITX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNITX achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than MRFOX's -0.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNITX having a 16.12% annualized return and MRFOX not far behind at 15.41%.


FNITX

1D
0.02%
1M
3.48%
YTD
9.30%
6M
12.43%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
27.24%
5Y*
15.24%
10Y*
16.12%

MRFOX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
-1.78%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNITX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
9.30%22.36%34.61%35.61%-26.67%24.10%23.30%28.81%-4.89%27.76%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
-0.99%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FNITX and MRFOX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between FNITX and MRFOX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNITX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNITX
FNITX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FNITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNITX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FNITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNITX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNITX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNITXMRFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.09

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

0.66

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

1.90

+10.02

FNITX vs. MRFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNITX and MRFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNITXMRFOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

0.48

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.91

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

1.09

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.06

-0.44

Drawdowns

FNITX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNITX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNITX and MRFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNITXMRFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-29.10%

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-7.03%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-7.91%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.06%

-12.98%

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.06%

-29.10%

-2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-3.39%

+3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-2.37%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

2.44%

-0.09%

Volatility

FNITX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 2.49%. This indicates that FNITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNITXMRFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.49%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

6.94%

+3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

9.77%

+4.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

12.06%

+6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

14.26%

+5.03%

FNITX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNITX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNITX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

FNITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than MRFOX's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
9.36%11.08%6.33%6.43%18.00%13.42%8.54%6.62%14.33%7.86%4.99%4.45%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.64%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNITX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNITX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to MRFOX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNITX dropped -49.84% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.

FNITX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNITX and MRFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer