FNILX vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FNILX (Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both funds - FNILX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FNILX returned 13.10%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNILX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

FNILX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNILX achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 17.59% return.

FNILX

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 8.36%
• 6M: 8.67%
• 1Y: 24.79%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 17.59%
• 6M: 17.91%
• 1Y: 37.64%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 16.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNILX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund	8.36%	17.81%	25.47%	27.45%	-19.37%	26.67%	7.29%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	17.59%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FNILX and QQQM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.93

The correlation between FNILX and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNILX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNILX

FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNILX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNILX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.11	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.74	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.37	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	3.02	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.84	11.23	+0.61

FNILX vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNILX and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNILX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNILX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNILX and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNILX	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-35.04%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-11.96%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	-22.70%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.40%	-35.04%	+9.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.87%	-3.33%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.36%	-8.23%	+2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	3.21%	-1.19%

Volatility

FNILX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) is 4.59%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that FNILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNILX	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	7.45%	-2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.76%	13.71%	-3.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	17.11%	-4.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.32%	22.40%	-5.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.05%	22.22%	-2.17%

FNILX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNILX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNILX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

FNILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than QQQM's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund	0.93%	1.01%	1.09%	1.34%	1.53%	0.95%	1.20%	1.17%	0.53%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.43%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNILX and QQQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FNILX and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNILX or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to FNILX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNILX dropped -33.76% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.