FNILX vs. FGNSX
FNILX (Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund) and FGNSX (Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund) are both mutual funds - FNILX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FGNSX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FNILX returned 13.32%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for FGNSX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNILX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FGNSX.
Performance
FNILX vs. FGNSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNILX achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than FGNSX's 0.77% return.
FNILX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 25.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- —
FGNSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FNILX vs. FGNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund | 9.63% | 17.81% | 25.47% | 27.45% | -19.37% | 26.67% | 21.13% | 31.79% | -13.60% |
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund | 0.77% | 3.08% | 3.47% | 3.56% | -0.36% | 0.14% | 1.04% | 2.11% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNILX and FGNSX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNILX vs. FGNSX — Risk / Return Rank
FNILX
FGNSX
FNILX vs. FGNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) and Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNILX | FGNSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 2.83 | -1.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 6.12 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 27.60 | -14.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNILX vs. FGNSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNILX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than FGNSX's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNILX and FGNSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNILX | FGNSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -2.35% | -31.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -0.50% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.08% | -2.35% | -16.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | -2.35% | -23.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | 0.00% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -0.25% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 0.11% | +1.92% |
Volatility
FNILX vs. FGNSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) at 0.28%. This indicates that FNILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNILX | FGNSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 0.28% | +4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 0.65% | +9.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 1.02% | +11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 2.06% | +15.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 1.65% | +18.39% |
FNILX vs. FGNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNILX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FGNSX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNILX vs. FGNSX - Dividend Comparison
FNILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FGNSX's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund | 2.34% | 2.63% | 3.31% | 2.57% | 0.84% | 0.34% | 0.83% | 1.79% | 1.36% |
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund | 0.92% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 1.17% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNILX and FGNSX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNILX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FGNSX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNILX dropped -33.76% vs FGNSX's -2.35%.
FGNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNILX and FGNSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer