PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNIDX vs. FAOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNIDX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FNIDX

1D
0.89%
1M
4.36%
YTD
11.27%
6M
13.24%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

FAOSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-1.63%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNIDX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
11.27%29.80%5.67%14.65%-18.89%7.65%12.98%22.20%-14.00%12.96%
FAOSX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z
0.00%15.36%5.06%20.52%-24.31%19.42%15.17%27.96%-14.73%11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FNIDX and FAOSX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between FNIDX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNIDX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNIDX
FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOSX
FAOSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FAOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNIDX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNIDXFAOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.95

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

-0.34

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

-0.59

+9.72

FNIDX vs. FAOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the FAOSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNIDX and FAOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNIDXFAOSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

-0.27

+2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.23

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.50

0.00

Drawdowns

FNIDX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNIDX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, smaller than the maximum FAOSX drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNIDX and FAOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNIDXFAOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-36.24%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-7.26%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-13.96%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.79%

-36.24%

+3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.86%

+5.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-7.93%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.97%

-1.00%

Volatility

FNIDX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FNIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNIDXFAOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

0.00%

+4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

4.08%

+8.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

9.18%

+5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

16.72%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

16.68%

-0.13%

FNIDX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNIDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNIDX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison

FNIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAOSX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z
8.67%8.67%1.80%1.12%0.85%2.07%0.00%1.70%5.30%3.93%
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
2.53%2.81%2.34%2.64%2.32%1.93%1.13%2.17%2.28%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNIDX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNIDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNIDX dropped -33.17% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.

FNIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNIDX and FAOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer