PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNIDX vs. FAOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNIDX vs. FAOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FNIDX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.00%
6M
3.66%
YTD
9.50%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.90%

FAOAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
-0.36%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
7.41%
ALL TIME*
5.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNIDX vs. FAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
9.50%29.80%5.67%14.65%-18.89%7.65%12.98%22.20%-14.00%12.96%
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
0.00%14.93%4.63%20.01%-24.61%18.90%14.71%27.39%-15.10%11.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FNIDX and FAOAX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2017

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FNIDX and FAOAX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNIDX vs. FAOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNIDX
FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOAX
FAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNIDX vs. FAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNIDXFAOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.93

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

-0.34

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

-0.52

+7.87

FNIDX vs. FAOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the FAOAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNIDX and FAOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNIDX vs. FAOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNIDX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, smaller than the maximum FAOAX drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNIDX and FAOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNIDXFAOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-60.03%

+26.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-7.29%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-13.99%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.79%

-36.50%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-5.87%

+3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-14.52%

+6.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

4.49%

-1.37%

Volatility

FNIDX vs. FAOAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FNIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNIDXFAOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

0.00%

+4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

0.00%

+14.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

7.67%

+8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

16.65%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

16.28%

+0.37%

FNIDX vs. FAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNIDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOAX's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNIDX vs. FAOAX - Dividend Comparison

FNIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FAOAX's 8.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
8.54%8.54%1.33%0.74%0.38%2.12%0.00%1.37%4.64%3.64%1.75%0.38%
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
2.57%2.81%2.34%2.64%2.32%1.93%1.13%2.17%2.28%1.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNIDX and FAOAX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNIDX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to FAOAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNIDX dropped -33.17% vs FAOAX's -60.03%.

FNIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNIDX and FAOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer