PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGZX vs. KGIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGZX vs. KGIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Kopernik International Fund (KGIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGZX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than KGIIX's 9.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGZX has underperformed KGIIX with an annualized return of 6.31%, while KGIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.


FNGZX

1D
0.06%
1M
4.33%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
-0.46%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-3.29%
10Y*
6.31%

KGIIX

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
9.82%
6M
12.86%
1Y
37.40%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGZX vs. KGIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNGZX
Franklin International Growth Fund
-0.57%10.54%0.66%15.24%-31.87%0.45%32.90%37.18%-14.30%36.28%
KGIIX
Kopernik International Fund
9.82%54.97%-7.01%13.86%-14.05%16.62%18.94%16.37%-6.24%10.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGZX and KGIIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.48

The correlation between FNGZX and KGIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGZX vs. KGIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGZX
FNGZX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FNGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

KGIIX
KGIIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
KGIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KGIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGZX vs. KGIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Kopernik International Fund (KGIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGZXKGIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.53

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

4.30

-4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

13.73

-13.87

FNGZX vs. KGIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGZX Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the KGIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGZX and KGIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGZXKGIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

2.91

-2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.67

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.81

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.93

-0.73

Drawdowns

FNGZX vs. KGIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGZX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than KGIIX's maximum drawdown of -27.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGZX and KGIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGZXKGIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.35%

-27.81%

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.29%

-8.76%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.20%

-13.58%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.63%

-27.81%

-19.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.63%

-27.81%

-19.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.54%

-4.26%

-17.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-6.11%

-8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.02%

2.74%

+3.28%

Volatility

FNGZX vs. KGIIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Kopernik International Fund (KGIIX) at 2.98%. This indicates that FNGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGZXKGIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

2.98%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.41%

10.23%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

12.97%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.32%

13.21%

+8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

12.64%

+7.68%

FNGZX vs. KGIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than KGIIX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGZX vs. KGIIX - Dividend Comparison

FNGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than KGIIX's 12.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNGZX
Franklin International Growth Fund
3.39%3.37%2.07%0.00%1.74%1.11%2.23%0.30%2.04%1.31%0.90%0.36%
KGIIX
Kopernik International Fund
12.99%14.26%0.48%12.56%2.46%5.77%2.89%2.50%1.19%1.35%0.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGZX and KGIIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNGZX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to KGIIX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGZX dropped -53.35% vs KGIIX's -27.81%.

KGIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGZX and KGIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer