PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGZX vs. FKGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGZX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGZX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than FKGRX's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGZX has underperformed FKGRX with an annualized return of 6.31%, while FKGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.


FNGZX

1D
0.06%
1M
4.33%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
-0.46%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-3.29%
10Y*
6.31%

FKGRX

1D
-0.29%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.09%
6M
6.63%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGZX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNGZX
Franklin International Growth Fund
-0.57%10.54%0.66%15.24%-31.87%0.45%32.90%37.18%-14.30%36.28%
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
7.09%15.38%17.96%27.54%-25.32%21.61%30.71%32.08%-3.37%26.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGZX and FKGRX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2008

0.73

The correlation between FNGZX and FKGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGZX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGZX
FNGZX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FNGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FKGRX
FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGZX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGZXFKGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.28

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

1.82

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

7.42

-7.56

FNGZX vs. FKGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGZX Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the FKGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGZX and FKGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGZXFKGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

1.61

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.50

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.73

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.71

-0.50

Drawdowns

FNGZX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGZX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, roughly equal to the maximum FKGRX drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGZX and FKGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGZXFKGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.35%

-51.08%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.29%

-11.48%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.20%

-21.72%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.63%

-32.22%

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.63%

-32.52%

-15.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.54%

-0.29%

-21.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-6.74%

-7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.02%

2.81%

+3.21%

Volatility

FNGZX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) at 3.10%. This indicates that FNGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGZXFKGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

3.10%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.41%

10.10%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

12.97%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.32%

19.59%

+1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

19.53%

+0.79%

FNGZX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FKGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGZX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison

FNGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than FKGRX's 13.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
13.42%14.37%8.34%6.26%10.49%9.19%7.97%5.75%1.65%2.38%3.26%3.88%
FNGZX
Franklin International Growth Fund
3.39%3.37%2.07%0.00%1.74%1.11%2.23%0.30%2.04%1.31%0.90%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGZX and FKGRX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNGZX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to FKGRX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGZX dropped -53.35% vs FKGRX's -51.08%.

FKGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGZX and FKGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer