FNGZX vs. APHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX).
FNGZX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 2, 2008. APHIX is an actively managed fund by Artisan Partners. It was launched on Jul 1, 1997.
Performance
FNGZX vs. APHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNGZX vs. APHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGZX Franklin International Growth Fund | -12.37% | 10.54% | 0.66% | 15.24% | -31.87% | 0.45% | 32.90% | 37.18% | -14.30% | 36.28% |
APHIX Artisan International Fund Institutional Class | 3.79% | 36.49% | 10.89% | 14.52% | -19.35% | 9.10% | 7.84% | 29.43% | -10.81% | 31.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGZX achieves a -12.37% return, which is significantly lower than APHIX's 3.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGZX has underperformed APHIX with an annualized return of 5.30%, while APHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.34% annualized return.
FNGZX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -12.52%
- YTD
- -12.37%
- 6M
- -14.13%
- 1Y
- -1.02%
- 3Y*
- 0.03%
- 5Y*
- -4.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.30%
APHIX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGZX vs. APHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than APHIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNGZX vs. APHIX — Risk / Return Rank
FNGZX
APHIX
FNGZX vs. APHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGZX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | 1.86 | -1.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | 2.39 | -2.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.35 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 2.53 | -2.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 10.66 | -11.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGZX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 1.86 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.62 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.58 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.29 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGZX and APHIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNGZX vs. APHIX - Dividend Comparison
FNGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than APHIX's 21.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGZX Franklin International Growth Fund | 3.85% | 3.37% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.74% | 1.11% | 2.23% | 0.30% | 2.04% | 1.31% | 0.90% | 0.36% |
APHIX Artisan International Fund Institutional Class | 21.80% | 22.63% | 10.37% | 2.10% | 2.84% | 23.52% | 3.45% | 5.44% | 10.02% | 0.91% | 1.50% | 0.73% |
Drawdowns
FNGZX vs. APHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGZX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum APHIX drawdown of -68.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGZX and APHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGZX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -68.47% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.29% | -9.77% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.63% | -33.73% | -13.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.63% | -33.73% | -13.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.85% | -9.77% | -21.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.06% | -23.20% | +9.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 2.59% | +2.29% |
Volatility
FNGZX vs. APHIX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX) at 6.04%. This indicates that FNGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNGZX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 6.04% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 10.13% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.62% | 15.33% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 15.61% | +5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 16.16% | +4.02% |