FNGG vs. TERG
FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGG is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FNGG charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
FNGG vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 118.24% return.
FNGG
- 1D
- 3.83%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 20.01%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 22.57%
- 3Y*
- 46.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.19%
TERG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -8.01%
- 6M
- 44.99%
- YTD
- 118.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $659.98K | $756.57K | $1.71M | |
| $2.08M | $2.39M | $4.94M |
FNGG vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 11.69% | -7.26% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 118.24% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGG and TERG is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGG vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
FNGG
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNGG vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGG | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGG vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGG | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.33% | -60.59% | -30.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.39% | -48.67% | +31.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -18.83% | -35.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | — | — |
Volatility
FNGG vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGG | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 158.05% | -113.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.29% | 158.05% | -90.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.29% | 158.05% | -90.76% |
FNGG vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGG vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 10.66% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGG and TERG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FNGG.
FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 10.66%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FNGG and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for FNGG and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer