FNGG vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. FNGG is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.

Performance

FNGG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.

FNGG

• 1D: 3.83%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 20.01%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 1Y: 22.57%
• 3Y*: 46.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.19%

LINT

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -47.53%
• 6M: 154.25%
• YTD: 259.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares	$659.98K	$756.57K	$1.71M
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.47M	$20.67M	$35.74M

FNGG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares	11.69%	-3.57%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	259.95%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGG and LINT is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.40

FNGG vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGG	LINT
Technology	60.2%	100.0%
Communication Services	29.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNGG vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNGG

FNGG Risk / Return Rank: 19
FNGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FNGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FNGG Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FNGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FNGG Martin Ratio Rank: 17

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNGG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGG	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.90	—	—

Drawdowns

FNGG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGG	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.33%	-69.02%	-22.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.39%	-62.88%	+45.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.74%	-23.85%	-30.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FNGG	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.43%	169.51%	-125.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.29%	169.51%	-102.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.29%	169.51%	-102.22%

FNGG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNGG and LINT have an expense ratio of 0.97%.

Dividends

FNGG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, more than LINT's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares	10.66%	11.89%	0.79%	0.88%	0.00%	4.99%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.76%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGG and LINT in my portfolio?

FNGG and LINT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FNGG or LINT?

Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGG or LINT?

FNGG and LINT have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGG or LINT?

FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 10.66%, compared with 0.76% for LINT.